预计阅读本页时间:-
The Value of Getting Things Half Right
There’s very little these days that we accomplish by ourselves. Most of the time, we have partners, colleagues, employees, friends, clients, associates—and the list goes on—with whom we work. And more often than not, our ability to get things done is, in part at least, dependent on their willingness and drive to get things done.
广告:个人专属 VPN,独立 IP,无限流量,多机房切换,还可以屏蔽广告和恶意软件,每月最低仅 5 美元
So to get them on board, we create lengthy presentations to make a convincing case—and we lose our audience. Or we hold long meetings to gain buy-in—but our bored colleagues end up spending the time on their BlackBerrys. Maybe we try to get good visibility by copying lots of people on our emails, but instead they simply delete them, and us, as irrelevant.
Because none of that stuff works. In fact, it works against us.
There are times in life when I expect something to be just right. Perfect. Like when I open the box of my new MacBook Air, for example. Or when I take money out of the ATM.
In most cases, though, I expect imperfect. And when working with others, I think that’s a good thing—but not in the if-I-expect-imperfect-I-won’t-be-disappointed sense.
I’m not suggesting you settle for imperfect. I’m advising you to shoot for it.
Several years ago, a large financial services company asked me to help them roll out a new performance management process for two thousand people.
“Why me? Why not do it yourselves?” I asked my prospective client. This might seem strange coming from a consultant, but I always think companies are better off doing things themselves if they can.
“We tried!” she responded with exasperation. “We identified the standards we expect from people. We created the technology system in which to write the reviews. We sent out lots of communication. We practically wrote the reviews for them. But they’re not doing it. After two years of training people, we still have only a 50 percent rate of completion. Now we’re looking into whether we can give people a bonus for doing reviews—”
“Wait,” I said, interrupting her. “You’re going to pay managers extra to talk to their employees?”
She looked a little embarrassed.
“Give me six months,” I said.
When I reviewed the materials, I was impressed, even intimidated. They had paid meticulous attention to detail. Not only in what they gave their employees (the materials looked beautiful), but also in how they tried to get people to use the system.
They followed all the rules of traditional change management. They had sponsors (senior-level people who spoke about the importance of performance management). They had change agents (people whose job it was to make sure that everyone was committed to the change). They had time lines, communication plans, and training programs.
Still, only half the managers were completing their reviews.
I assembled my team: fifty people spread out across three continents. I redesigned the materials, the training, the messages. Then I began the roll-out, right on schedule.
It was a complete and utter failure. People resisted. They complained. My own team dissented.
So I pushed harder. After all, I’d designed this myself. It was perfect.
And that’s when it hit me. Of course I thought the performance review process was perfect. I’d created it. I would be more than happy to use it. But I wasn’t the person who needed to use it. Here’s what I figured out:
My perfect is not their perfect.
They don’t have a perfect. In fact, there is no they. There are two thousand individuals, each of whom wants something a little different.
The more perfect I think it is, the less willing I’ll be to let anyone change it.
The only way to make it useful to everyone is to allow each person to change it to suit him- or herself.
The only way people will use it is if they do change it in some way.
The only way I will encourage them to change it and make it their own is if I make it imperfect.
So I stopped the roll-out immediately. And I changed everything to make it half right, half finished. It wasn’t pretty, but it was usable.
Even the trainings were half designed. Halfway through each training, after describing the process, I always asked the same question—a question people were more than happy to answer:
Why won’t this work for you?
“There are too many standards on this form. I don’t have that much to say about my employees, and it will take too much time.”
I responded to every answer with the same response:
That’s a good point. So how can you change it to make it work?
“I guess I could just fill out the standards that apply to that employee.” Great.
“Three people who don’t report to me are asking me to review them, and I have nothing to say about them.”
That’s a good point. So how can you change it to make it work?
“I can redirect the review to the appropriate manager.” Great.
“There’s no standard here that relates directly to the issue my employee is having.”
That’s a good point. So how can you change it to make it work?
“I’ll just write in the standard I think is appropriate.” Great.
One by one, we dealt with all the issues people saw as obstacles. One by one, they made their own changes. One by one, they took ownership for the system and became accountable for using it.
Is this only a large-scale change idea? Not at all. It’s useful whenever you need someone else to take ownership for something. Just get it half right.
Hiring someone new? Get the job description half right and then ask her: Why won’t this work for you? When she answers, you respond: That’s a good point. So how can you change it to make it work? She’ll look at you a little funny because, after all, you’re the boss and you should be telling her what to do. Then you’ll just smile and wait for her to answer and the two of you will redesign the job right there, right then. No better time or place to send the message that she is accountable for her own success.
Delegating work to someone? Give him the task and then ask: Why won’t this work for you? When he answers, you respond: That’s a good point. So how can you change it to make it work?
Here’s the hard part: When someone changes your plan, you might think the new approach will be less effective. Resist the temptation to explain why your way is better. Just smile and say Great. The drive, motivation, and accountability that person will gain from running with her own idea will be well worth it.
This doesn’t just work internally. It’s also a great way to make a sale. Get the pitch half right and then say… you guessed it… Why won’t this work for you? Then go ahead and redesign the offer in collaboration with your potential client. You’ll turn a potential client into a collaborative partner who ends up buying his own idea and then working with you to make it successful.
Forget about lengthy presentations and long meetings. During economic downturns, when it is critical to get more done with fewer resources, getting things half right will take you half as long and give you better results.
How did this work in the performance review roll-out? One year later, the numbers came in: Ninety-five percent of managers had done their reviews.
Imperfectly, I expect. Which, of course, is the key.
Don’t settle for imperfect. Shoot for it.